I found Jesus.
I don’t mean in the; ‘I’m born again’; ‘send money to my t.v. ministry’; ‘hooray for Sarah Palin’; sense. I mean I found an image of Jesus in the frame beneath an 8×10 photograph of my cousin Steve. Steve’s picture was taken when he was about 5 years old. He’s 56 now.
With my previous serendipitous finds under old family photos, I have shared the results of my research about the subjects and their filmography. That doesn’t seem appropriate in this case. Most people, arguably any that care, already know what they believe to be true about his bio. Also, most of us know many of the movies in which he was involved. I guess true believers could argue that he was involved in all movies (maybe not porn….or Ishtar) but I was thinking of a more narrow definition; Greatest Story Ever Told; The Robe; Quo Vadis, The Life of Brian, etc. Given that someone in the dark days of my family’s past thought it prudent to slide my young cousin’s picture in on top of an image of JC, I thought my time would be better spent looking into something of more pressing concern; like the definitions of and penalties for blasphemy and what info I can glean about generational curses.
Blasphemy’ is; “the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for a religious deity or the irreverence towards religious or holy persons or things.” Poop!
Cousin Steve was an exceptionally beautiful child and my Grandmother certainly thought he could do no wrong, but I would be hard-pressed to claim that covering up the face of OLAS (our Lord and Savior) for the past 50 years with his youthful countenance might not represent “irreverence towards religious or holy things”. So just how big a deal is this?
Christian theology condemns blasphemy. It is spoken of in Mark 3:29, where blaspheming the Holy Spirit is spoken of as unforgivable—the eternal sin”; I guess, in that sense, it is like the Cruciatus Curse in Harry Potter. Yikes! I can already feel the Dementors circling over Phoenix.
Thomas Aquinas says that “it is clear that blasphemy, which is a sin committed directly against God, is more grave than murder, which is a sin against one’s neighbor. … it is called the most grievous sin, for as much as it makes every sin more grievous.”. Come on Tom; give a guy a break!
The Westminster Larger Catechism explains that “The sins forbidden in the third commandment are, the abuse of it in an ignorant, vain, irreverent, profane…mentioning…by blasphemy…to profane jests, …vain janglings, …to charms or sinful lusts and practices.” I’m not sure what “vain janglings” are but I choose to believe they have nothing to do with the wanton framing of family photos. Unfortunately, I am still seeing ‘irreverent practices’ mentioned. Double Poop!
For a moment I thought there was a loophole in there. They specifically cite the 3rd Commandment; which makes sense since the Westminster Catechism was written by and for Protestants. For Catholics, however, the 3rd Commandment is; “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy”. I have no reason to believe the heinous framing transgression occurred on a Sunday so I can claim a pretty clear conscience re: violating Catholic #3. I’d like to think that gets me off the hook with Thomas Aquinas but he would probably point out the clear violation of the Catholic #2. I don’t like my odds in a debate of the issue with T. A. He has an unfair advantage; being a saint and all.
On the other side of the coin, if I were Catholic there are specific prayers and devotions known as Acts of Reparation for Blasphemy. Unfortunately, all of my family are Southern Baptists so we take no truck with such papist gyrations.
Islam and Judaism are equally harsh in their condemnation of blasphemy but since it was a picture of OLAS involved in the actual framing offense I think they will both cede jurisdiction to the Christians. That doesn’t help me much.
One would think there ought to be some kind of break since I am not the one who committed the actual framing offense. No such luck! I couldn’t find anything specific about blasphemous framing practices but everywhere I looked was more bad news. If blasphemy is worse than other sins, I can’t really claim the punishment should be more lenient than, for example, having a child out-of-wedlock where the family is cursed for 10 generations. I am not too worried about downstream generations since I do not anticipate progeny. It is the upstream generations that are worrisome. Both Exodus and Numbers refer to; “visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation.” That’s no cause for optimism. On the back of the image is a note stating it was copyrighted in 1937. More importantly, Steve’s picture was taken about 1960. I can’t assume the guilty ancestor was more than 4 generations removed but still framing photos in 1960.
To add insult to condemnation, I saw on the news this morning that the United Nations General Assembly plans to introduce a resolution condemning blasphemy. I don’t know who told them about my cousin Steve’s photo but I think that is a bit of an over-reaction. In any case, there is no way to spin it as good news.
Triple Poop!
It is the High Holy Days, Just repent and be contrite and perhaps you will be inscribed in the Book of Life for another year to sin again. The problem of Sin worked when they put all of them on a goat (the scape goat) and drove it out into the wilderness. Besides “sin” just means missing the mark.
I am surprised that you found such a picture, I thought you had said that your family were Baptist, and this picture is very Roman Catholic with a European looking Jesus and not the Jew of middle Eastern origin that he really was, darker skin, black eyes and hair and more hairy also as would fit someone with his background. Also the clothing is interesting as it is Roman and not Jewish, but that was the tradition in Europe. As for Blasphemy I can see how that is a more grievous sin given that it is made against God the creator of all things where as murder is at a human level. So maybe your family were secret RC. Did Cousin Steve grow up to be a exceptionally good looking man?
As for the resolution on blasphemy at the UN I am not surprised. But it will probably not be binding on member States.
Thanks for the insightful comment. Your analysis is as correct as it could be with the info I provided.
The photo was my grandmother’s. I don’t know, of course, but I imagine my aunt (who was raised Catholic) gave her the photo as a gift. Her father, with whom she lived, was a practicing Catholic. Their home was full of ‘Catholica’. I believe her father was a first generation immigrant from Eastern Europe; Poland I think. My grandmother was vocally anti-Catholic but I can easily imagine she never knew the JC imagine was behind the picture.
The UN thing is targeted toward the recent anti-Islamic film. I believe the General Assembly has considered such a resolution before.
I have never seen my cousin as an adult. The last photo I’ve seen was high school age. But I’m fairly certain he is attractive. As a boy he looked exactly like his father and (our mutual) grandfather at similar ages so I imagine that continued into middle age.
Your only hope out of this sticky wicket is to convert and become a MOT(member of the tribe). OLAS, being merely a preacher and “false prophet” to the Jewish people means you avoid having the sins of the fathers visited upon you as no blasphemy has occurred.
Now if you could just get Cousin Steve to convert too…..and then trace his ancestors back to the House of King David, gather the faithful back to Israel, rebuild the Temple, and bring about world peace so Steve can lay claim to the Messiah title….now THAT would be the father of all synchronicities. 😉
What a good idea! It’s a better plan than I had. I was looking for a calf to sacrifice.
I meant serenpidities….lol
You could always just become an atheist and forgo the blasphemy route entirely! 😉
As a child, I always wondered why Jesus was white/caucasian in pictures. Especially since he was obviously Jewish in the Bible. I was a cynical child, it would seem.
So that’s what OLAS means!
One of my favorite streets in Ft. Lauderdale is LAS OLAS, now I know it is…
The Our Lord and Savior street!
Wow thats a load off my brain!
I like the way you think. I always thought it meant “Surf” but I like your idea better. It makes Ft. L sound so much more spiritual
“for example, having a child out-of-wedlock where the family is cursed for 10 generations.” My mother was said child and I am 2nd generation so blame the framing on me, after all I am already cursed. My mother used some other passage to say that we were damned as I recall, so I should do what I want cause it was already too late.
Sounds like we’re in the same boat. Appreciate the offer to take the blame on the framing thing but all that does is get me off the hook for the 3rd commandment but puts me on the hook for #9. I am resigned to my fate.
Blasphemous Baptist babble !
Where is Steve’s picture? We know what OLAS looks like !
Thanks for reading/commenting. I appreciate it.
The idea of the recent “serendipity” posts was finding pictures or images that had been hidden for decades underneath a family photo; not the family pic itself. In this case, that particular image of OLAS was the one I found.
The other reason I didn’t include Steve’s pic is, even though we haven’t been in contact in decades, to the best of my knowledge he is still living. I wouldn’t post his pic without his approval. The family photos I’ve been posting, excluding pics of myself, are family members who are deceased.
Thanks again for reading/commenting.
I was thinking the same thing as Laurent when I saw the picture. It’s the “Sacred Heart of Jesus” of Catholic fame. Every time I see a picture of Jesus, it reminds me of a cartoon I saw years ago, based on the TV show, “To Tell The Truth”. In it are three different Jesus persons. Jesus #1 wears a sorrowful look and has a crown of thorns on his head, blood dripping down. Jesus #2 has long blond hair and blue eyes. Jesus #3 looks like a person out of a police lineup. #1 is the Catholic Jesus. #2 is the Protestant Jesus and #3 is the historical Jesus. Will the real Jesus please stand up!
Thanks for reading/commenting. I appreciate it.
I did a Google Image Search for JC and the diversity of images is almost overwhelming. I can’t say I was surprised but it is interesting to see them all on the same screen.
If I say I don’t believe in the Easter Bunny or Jesus Christ, is that considered blasphemy? 😦
lol – probably yes. But if you don’t believe it doesn’t really matter; eh?